Is it alright to portray God against His nature in works of fiction? I ask this question because I have been deciding whether to write about a book called
The Shack. I have been hesitant to criticize a book by a christian author. This book is on top of the christian book charts, and has been endorsed by the likes of Michael W. Smith. After wrestling with this for a couple of months, I heard an interview with the author last week. The author, William P. Young was very disturbing to listen to. Let me start by saying I have not read the entire book only portions posted online. But I have been greatly disturbed by what I have read, and his replies to questions on the book.
To start there are good parts to this book. The book does represent the Trinity fairly well, as well as the need for forgiveness and a personal relationship with God. But now let's look how he describes the characters in the book. God the Father is an African American woman named Papa. Jesus is a Middle Easterner dressed with tool belt. And the Holy Spirit is an Asian woman named Sarayu. First problem is the fact that God the Father cannot be seen. 1 Timothy 6:16 -
who alone possesses immortality and dwells in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see To Him be honor and eternal dominion! Amen. Next problem I have is that God is not a woman. God is always referred to in the bible as the Father. When questioned on this in the interview, Mr. Young quickly took the egalitarian position that there is no male or female. He uses the often misused verse Galatians 3:28 -
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus,". This is the same verse used by churches promoting female pastors. This verse is simply saying that there is no favoritism when it comes to salvation. Salvation is for every kind of person and we are all one in Christ. He uses this verse to say God can be either male or female.
He goes on in the book to say that God submits Himself to humans. To defend this position in the interview he used Luke 1:38 - And Mary said, "Behold, the bondslave of the Lord; may it be done to me according to your word." And the angel departed from her. He says that this is Mary giving God permission to go ahead with his plan. And this is an example of God submitting to Mary's will. This is the same faulty doctrine that has led to Mary worship in the Catholic church. There is only one instance in the bible I know of, where any member of the Trinity submits to any human. Galatians 4:4 -
But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law,. Jesus was born under the Law and would have had to obeyed His parents as a child according to the Law.
Lastly, I want to look at the books Universalist leanings. He starts by saying the all sins of all people are forgiven, even those who chose not to have a relationship with Jesus. He refused to answer when questioned on this in the interview. If you have not come to accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, you are still dead in your sins. Here is a excerpt from the book;
Jesus said, "Those who love me come from every system that exists. They were Buddhists or Mormons, Baptist or Muslims, Democrats, Republicans and many who don't vote or are not part of any Sunday morning or religious institutions. I have followers who were murderers and many who were self-righteous. Some are bankers and bookies, Americans and Iraqis, Jews and Palestinians. I have no desire to make them Christian, but I do want to join them in their transformation into sons and daughters of my Papa, into my brothers and sisters, into my beloved.". He says that Jesus has no desire to make them Christian, He just wants to join their transformation into children of God. This seems to be a reoccuring theme, but no man comes to the Father, except through the Son. Jesus is the only way. Not everyone will go to Heaven.
We need to speak of God with reverence and awe. This is another book that portrays God as our buddy. A dumbed down and weaker version of the real thing. How have we gone from early Jews being scared to say His name, to the total lack of respect we show today? When we speak of God it should be with respect to His holiness, even in fiction. This book shows total lack of respect for who God really is.